Accreditations
Tuition fee EU nationals (2026/2027)
Tuition fee non-EU nationals (2026/2027)
Programme Structure for 2026/2027
| Curricular Courses | Credits | |
|---|---|---|
| 1st Year | ||
|
Contemporary Social Inequalities
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
|
Research Design
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
|
Sociology of Modernity
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
|
Institutions in Contemporary Societies
6.0 ECTS
|
Parte Escolar > Mandatory Courses | 6.0 |
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Sociology > Supplementary
6.0 ECTS
|
6.0 | |
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Free > 1st Year > Supplementary
6.0 ECTS
|
6.0 | |
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Free > 1st Year > Supplementary
6.0 ECTS
|
6.0 | |
| 2nd Year | ||
|
Master Project in Sociology
48.0 ECTS
|
Final Work | 48.0 |
|
Master Dissertation in Sociology
48.0 ECTS
|
Final Work | 48.0 |
|
Parte Escolar > Optional Courses > Free > 2nd Year
6.0 ECTS
|
6.0 |
Contemporary Social Inequalities
Students who successfully complete this course will be able to:
LO1. Identify the main dimensions and processes of contemporary social inequalities;
LO2. Explain theoretically and illustrate empirically the intersections of inequalities;
LO3. Connect theoretical concepts of social justice and contemporary social inequalities;
LO4. Compare social inequality in developed, emergent, and least developed countries;
LO5. Analyse processes and trends of global inequalities;
LO6. Use methodologically the main indicators, measures, and categorisations of inequality;
LO7. Use online databases with global inequality indicators.
S1. Inequality issues: analytical perspectives and current debates
S2. Theory: social inequalities in globalization context
S3. Methodology: inequality indicators, measures and categories
S4. Resources and opportunity inequalities (income, wealth, education, work)
S5. Vital and existential inequalities (life expectancy and health; gender and ethnic-racial discrimination)
S6. Intersections of inequalities and social mobility
S7. Inequalities, social justice and public policy
S8. Inequalities in Europe: integration or divergence?
S9. Inequalities in the world: cases, trends and comparisons
S10. Human development, poverty, global inequalities and climate change
The assessment of the course "Contemporary Social Inequalities" is structured to reflect the development of students' theoretical and practical skills throughout the semester, through a combination of group and individual activities.
The semester-long assessment is divided into three main components:
1. Group Activity (50%)
a. Classroom Presentations on Selected Topics (30%)
• Description: Students select a topic of interest based on the course content. Using resources provided by the professor, they are organised into teams according to their chosen topic. They must prepare a proposal to deepen the topic and discuss it with the professor in a preparatory tutorial, exploring different theoretical and empirical perspectives. Presentations are evaluated based on clarity, organisation, depth of analysis, and ability to respond to questions from peers and the professor.
• Objective: This activity aims to develop research, critical analysis, and communication skills, aligned with learning objectives OA1, OA2, OA4, and OA5. Carrying out this activity necessarily involves being present in class
b. Comments on Peers' Presentations (20%)
• Description: During the presentations, students are encouraged to actively participate by making constructive comments and pertinent questions. This component evaluates students' ability to critique and reflect on their peers' work, promoting a collaborative learning environment. One of the groups is appointed as the debate rapporteur, responsible for producing a report to be sent to the professor and the presenting group.
• Objective: This activity reinforces critical analysis and collaboration skills, aligning with learning objectives OA3 and OA6. Carrying out this activity necessarily involves being present in class
2. Written essay with Consultation (50%)
a. In-depth Study of the Topic Chosen by the Student (50%)
• Description: At the end of the semester, each student takes a written essay with consultation, focused on the topic they chose and deepened during the classes. This test evaluates the student's ability to apply the theoretical and methodological knowledge acquired, using resources and electronic databases to support their answers.
• Objective: This component aims to assess the in-depth understanding of the studied topics, synthesis ability, and practical application of knowledge, aligning with learning objectives OA1, OA2, OA3, OA5, OA6, and OA7.
Basic Conditions for Semester-long Assessment
• To pass the course, students must achieve a minimum weighted average of 10 points, with no less than 8 points in any of the assessment components.
Final Assessment (100%)
• Written exame , responding to a prompt defined by the professors.
Wilkinson, R & Pickett, K (2018) The Inner Level, Allen Lane
Waitkus, N, et al (2024) Wealth and class analysis: exploitation, closure and exclusion, WP 143, III LSE
UNDP (2022) Uncertain times, unsettled lives Shaping our future in a transforming world, HDR
Therborn, G (2013) The Killing Fields of Inequality, Polity Press
Sandel, M J (2023) A Tirania do Mérito, Presença.
Piketty, T (2020) Capital e Ideologia, Temas e Debates
Milanovic, B (2025) Visões da Desigualdade, Actual
Mauritti, R et al (2016) The social structure of European inequality, SPP, 81
Lamont, M (2018), Addressing recognition gaps: destigmatization and the reduction of inequality, ASR, 83(3)
Costa, AF (2012) Desigualdades Sociais Contemporâneas, Mundos Sociais
Chancel, L et al. (2022) World Inequality Report 2022
Carmo, RM et al (org) (2018) Desigualdades Sociais: Portugal e a Europa, Mundos Sociais
Carmo, RM (2021) Social inequalities: theories, concepts and problematics, SN Social Sciences, 1:116
Websites com indicadores de desigualdades:
DataLABOR: https://datalabor.pt/
EIGE - European Institute for Gender Equality: https://eige.europa.eu/gender-statistics/dgs
European Social Survey: www.europeansocialsurvey.org
Eurostat: http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu
Gapminder, a fact-based world view: http://www.gapminder.org
Gobal Education Monitoring Report: http://en.unesco.org/gem-report/
Inequality.org: https://inequality.org
Inequality Around the World: http://web.worldbank.org
Inequality Watch: http://inequalitywatch.eu/
Instituto Nacional de Estatística: http://www.ine.pt
International Labour Organization: http://www.ilo.org
Observatório das Desigualdades: http://observatorio-das-desigualdades.com
OECD – Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development: http://www.oecd.org
https://oxfamilibrary.openrepository.com/
Pordata: http://www.pordata.pt/
UNDP – United Nations Development Programme / Human Development Reports: http://www.hdr.undp.org/
WID – World Inequality Database: https://wid.world/
World Inequality Database on Education: https://www.education-inequalities.org/
Bibliografia complementar
Abrantes, Pedro (2022), “Educação e classes sociais em Portugal: Continuidades e mutações no século XXI”. Sociologia Problemas e Práticas, n.º 99: 9-27.
Almeida, João Ferreira (2013), Desigualdades e Perspetivas dos Cidadãos. Portugal e a Europa. Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
Alvaredo, Facundo; Chancel, Lucas; Piketty, Thomas; Saez, Emmanuel; Zucman, Gabriel (2018), World Inequality Report 2018, WID.WORLD.
Atkinson, Anthony B. (2015), Inequality: What Can be Done?, Cambridge (Mass), Harvard University Press [(2016), Desigualdade: O Que Fazer?, Lisboa, Bertrand].
Ávila, Patrícia (2007), “Literacia e desigualdades sociais na sociedade do conhecimento”, in Costa, AF, Machado, FL e Ávila, P (orgs.) (2007), Sociedade e Conhecimento (Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. II), Lisboa, Celta: 21-44.
Ballas, Dimitris, Danny Dorling and Benjamin Hennig (2014), The Social Atlas of Europe, Bristol, Policy Press.
Baptista, Isabel, Eric Marlier et al (2021), Social Protection and Inclusion Policy Responses to the COVID-19 Crisis. An analysis of policies in 35 countries, Brussels, European Commission, https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?langId=en&catId=89&newsId=10065&furtherNews=yes
Berkhout, Esmé, Nick Galasso, Max Lawson, Pablo Andrés Rivero Morales, Anjela Taneja, and Diego Alejo Vázquez Pimentel (2021), The Inequality Virus : Bringing Together a World Torn Aprat by Croronavirus Through a Fair, Just and Sustainable Economy, OXFAM BRIEFING PAPER – JANUARY 2021.
Bihr, Alain & Roland Pfefferkorn (2008), Le Système des Inégalités, Paris, La Découverte.
Bourguignon, François (2015), The Globalization of Inequality, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Boushey, Heather, J. Bradford DeLong and Marshall Steinbaum (2017), After Piketty: The Agenda for Economics and Inequality, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press.
Bregman, Rutger (2017), Utopia for Realists, London, Bloomsbury.
Bühlmann, F et al. (2025), Varieties of Economic Elites? Preliminary Results From the World Elite Database (WED) The British Journal of Sociology, 76:663–673.
Caldas, J.C., Silva, A.A., e Cantante, F. (2020) As consequências socioeconómicas da COVID-19 e a sua desigual distribuição. CoLABOR. Disponível em https://colabor.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/07/As-consequencias-socioeconomicas-da-COVID-19-e-sua-desigual-distribuicao.pdf
Cantante, Frederico (2019), O Risco da Desigualdade, Coimbra, Almedina
Cantante, Frederico (2018), O Mercado de Trabalho em Portugal e nos Países Europeus: Estatísticas de 2018, Observatório das Desigualdades.
Carmo, R. M. (Coord) (2024), Jovens e o Trabalho em Portugal: Desigualdades, (Des)Proteção e Futuro, Coimbra, Actual Editora.
Carmo, R. M. et al (2024), O Mundo do Trabalho a Partir de Baixo: Retratos e Percursos, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
Carmo, R. M. (2024), Direito ao Mundo da Vida: Esboços Teóricos para Políticas Amplas, Lisboa, Tinta-da-china.
Carmo, Renato Miguel do, Inês Tavares, e Ana Filipa Cândido (Orgs.) (2022), Que Futuro para a Igualdade? Pensar a Sociedade e o Pós-pandemia, Lisboa, Observatório das Desigualdades, CIES-Iscte. Disponível em: https://www.observatorio-das-desigualdades.com/observatoriodasdesigualdades/wp-content/uploads/2022/02/Que-Futuro-para-a-Igualdade_Pensar-a-Sociedade-e-o-Po%CC%81s-pandemia.pdf
Carmo, Renato Miguel do, Jorge Caleiras, Isabel Roque e Rodrigo Viera de Assis (2021), O Trabalho Aqui e Agora: Crises, Percursos e Vulnerabilidades, Lisboa, Tinta-da-China.
Carmo, Renato Miguel do, Inês Tavares, e Ana Filipa Cândido (Orgs.) (2020), Um Olhar Sociológico sobre a Crise Covid-19 em Livro, Lisboa, Observatório das Desigualdades, CIES-Iscte. Disponível em: https://www.observatorio-das-desigualdades.com/2020/11/29/umolharsociologicosobreacovid19emlivro/
Carmo R, Rodrigues M A (2020), A Miséria do Tempo: Vidas Suspensas pelo Desemprego, Lisboa, Tinta-da-China.
Carmo R, Nunes N, Ferreira D (2019) Social inequalities and collective action in times of crises: the case of the Lisbon Metropolitan Area. Journal of Civil Society. 15:2, 178-196
Carmo, Renato Miguel e Ana Rita Matias (2019), Retratos da Precariedade. Quotidianos e Aspirações dos Trabalhadores Jovens, Lisboa, Tinta-da-China.
Carmo, Renato Miguel; Rio, Cédric; Medgyesi, Márton (eds.) (2018), Reducing Inequalities: A Challenge for the European Union?, Basingstoke (UK), Palgrave Macmillan.
Cantante, Frederico (2019), O Risco da Desigualdade, Coimbra, Almedina.
Chancel, Lucas (2020), Unsustainable Inequalities: Social Justice and the Environment, Cambridge, Massachusetts: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Chancel, L., Bothe, P., Voituriez, T. (2023) Climate Inequality Report 2023, World Inequality Lab Study 2023/1
Choonara, Joseph; Murgia, Annalisa; Carmo, Renato Miguel (Eds.) (2022), Faces of Precarity: Critical Perspectives on Work, Subjectivities and Struggles, Bristol, Bristol University Press.
Costa, Alfredo Bruto (coord.) (2008), Um Olhar Sobre a Pobreza. Vulnerabilidade e Exclusão Social no Portugal Contemporâneo, Lisboa, Gradiva.
Costa, António Firmino da e Mauritti, Rosário (2018), “Classes sociais e interseções de desigualdades: Portugal e a Europa”, em Carmo, RM et al (orgs) (2018), Desigualdades Sociais: Portugal e a Europa, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais: 109-129.
Costa, António Firmino da; Mauritti, Rosário; Martins, Susana Cruz; Nunes, Nuno; Romão, Ana Lúcia (2018), “Distibutional and Categorical Inequalites in Europe: Structural Configurations”, in Carmo, RM; Rio, C; Medgyesi, M (eds.), Reducing Inequalities: A Challenge for the European Union?, Basingstoke (UK), Palgrave Macmillan.
Costa, António Firmino da; Mauritti, Rosário; Martins, Susana da Cruz; Nunes, Nuno; Romão, Ana Lúcia (2015), “A constituição de um espaço europeu de desigualdades”, Observatório das Desigualdades e-Working Papers, N.º 1/2015: 1-21; CIES-IUL, doi: 10.15847/CIESODWP012015.
Costa, António Firmino da, João Teixeira Lopes, e Ana Caetano (orgs.) (2014), Percursos de Estudantes no Ensino Superior: Fatores e Processos de Sucesso e Insucesso, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
Costa, António Firmino da (2012), Desigualdades Sociais Contemporâneas, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
Costa, António Firmino da (2012), “Desigualdades globais”, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 68: 9-32.
Costa, António Firmino da; Machado, Fernando Luís; Almeida, João Ferreira (2007), “Classes sociais e recursos educativos: uma análise transnacional”, em Costa, AF, Machado, FL & Ávila, P (orgs.), Sociedade e Conhecimento (Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. II), Lisboa, Celta Editora.
Costa, António Firmino da, Fernando Luís Machado, e Patrícia Ávila (orgs.) (2007), Sociedade e Conhecimento (Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. II), Lisboa, Celta.
Costa, António Firmino da, Rosário Mauritti, Susana da Cruz Martins, Fernando Luís Machado, e João Ferreira de Almeida (2000), “Classes sociais na Europa”, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 34: 9-46.
Crompton, Rosemary (2008), Class and Stratification (3rd edition), Cambridge, Polity.
Davis, A., 2023 [1981], Mulheres, Raça e Classe, Lisboa, Orfeu Negro.
Deaton, Angus (2013), The Great Escape: Health, Wealth, and The Origins of Inequality, Princeton, Princeton University Press [(2016), A Grande Evasão: Saúde, Riqueza e as Origens da Desigualdade, Lisboa, Presença].
Desmond, M. (2024), Poverty, by America, Penguin Books.
Diffenbaugh, Noah S. and Marshall Burke (2019), “Global warming has increased global economic inequality”, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 116(20), 9808–9813.
Diogo, F., Perista, P., Pinto, P. C. (Coord.) (2025) Homenagem a Alfredo Bruto da Costa: Estudos sobre a Pobreza e a Exclusão em Portugal, Liboa, Gradiva.
Dorling, D (2018), Peak Inequality, London, Policy Press.
Dorling, Danny (2017), The Equality Effect, Oxford, New Internationalist Publications.
Dorling, Daniel (2010), Injustice: Why Social Inequality Persists, Bristol, The Policy Press.
Dubet, François (2010), Les Places et les Chances. Repenser la Justice Sociale, Paris, La République des Idées.
Estanque, Elísio (2017), “Onde pára a classe média?”, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 83: 37-54.
Estevão, Pedro, Calado, Alexandre, e Capucha, Luís (2017) Resilience: moving from a “heroic” notion to a sociological concept, Sociologia Problemas e Práticas, 85: 9-25.
Eurofound (2017), Social mobility in Europe.
Eurofound (2017), The gender employment gap.
European Commission (2021), Employment and Social Developments in Europe 2021: Towards a strong social Europe in the aftermath of the COVID-19 Crisis: Reducing Disparities and Addressing Distributional Impacts, Annual Review, https://www.adcoesao.pt/sites/default/files/ke-bd-21-001-en-n.pdf
Fraser, Nancy (2008), Scales of Justice, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Galbraith, James K. (2015), Inequality and Instability, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Goldthorpe, John H. Sociology as a population science. Cambridge University Press, 2016.
Góis, Pedro (2011), A Construção Secular de uma Identidade Étnica Transnacional: A Aabo-Verdianidade, Dissertação de Doutoramento em Sociologia, Faculdade de Economia da Universidade de Coimbra, em: https://estudogeral.sib.uc.pt/bitstream/10316/17848/1/tese%20vers%C3%A3o%20final.pdf
Grusky, David B., and Szonja Szelényi (ed.) (2006), Inequality. Classic Readings in Race, Class, and Gender, Boulder, Westview Press.
Hickel, Jason (2017), The Divide. A Brief Guide to Global Inequality and its Solutions, London, Windmill Books.
Hill, Collins P. (2019), Intersectionality as critical social theory, Durham, Duke University Press.
ILO (2021), World Social Protection Report 2020-22, ‒ in pursuit of a better future
International Labour Office – Geneva: ILO, 2021, in: https://www.ilo.org/global/publications/books/WCMS_817572/lang--en/index.htm
ILO (2018), Decent work in Portugal 2008–18: From crisis to recovery [Trabalho Digno em Portugal 2008-18: Da crise à recuperação]
ILO (2019), The Global Labour Income Share and Distribution
Islam, S. Nazrul and John Winkel, 2017. "Climate Change and Social Inequality”, Working Papers 152, United Nations, Department of Economics and Social Affairs.
Lamont, M. (2019), From ‘having’ to ‘being’: self‐worth and the current crisis of American society. British Journal of Sociology, 70: 660-707.
Lamont, M. (2018), Addressing recognition gaps: destigmatization and the reduction of inequality, American Sociological Review, 83(3): 419-444.
Lopes, João Teixeira, Francisco Louçã e Lígia Ferro (2019), As Classes Médias em Portugal, Lisboa, Bertrand.
Lopes, João Teixeira, Francisco Louçã e Lígia Ferro (2017), As Classes Populares, Lisboa, Bertrand.
Louçã, Francisco, João Teixeira Lopes e Jorge Costa (2014), Os Burgueses, Lisboa, Bertrand.
Markovits, Daniel (2019), The Meritocracy Trap, New York, Penguin Press.
Mauritti, Rosário; Craveiro, Daniela; Cabrita, Luís; Botelho, Maria do Carmo; Nunes, Nuno; Silva, Sara Franco (2022), Territórios de Bem-Estar: Assimetrias nos Municípios Portugueses. Lisboa: FFMS
Mauritti, Rosário; Nunes, Nuno; Alves, João Emílio; Diogo, Fernando (2019), Desigualdades e desenvolvimento em Portugal. Um olhar à escala regional e aos territórios de baixa densidade. Sociologia On Line 19: 102-126.
Mauritti, Rosário; Martins, Susana da Cruz; Nunes, Nuno; Romão, Ana Lúcia; Costa, António Firmino (2016), “The social structure of European inequality”, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 81: 75-93.
Mauritti, R., Pintassilgo, S., Saleiro, S.P., Rocha, H.B. & Mendes, J. (2023). Mobilidade internacional por motivos de estudo: fluxos e distribuição de estudantes da CPLP no ensino superior e território português. Cidades, Comunidades e Territórios, 47 (dez./2023), pp. 1-17.
Mazzucato, M.; Ryan-Collins, J. (2022), Putting value creation back into “public value”: from market-fixing to market-shaping, Journal of Economic Policy Reform, 25:4, 345-360, DOI: 10.1080/17487870.2022.2053537
Milanovic, Branko (2019), Capitalism Alone. Cambridge (Mass.): Belknap.
Milanovic, Branko (2016), Global Inequality, Cambridge (Mass.), Belknap [(2017), A Desigualdade no Mundo, Lisboa, Actual].
Milanovic, Branko (2011), The Haves and the Have-Nots. A Brief and Idiosyncratic History of Global Inequality, New York, Basic Books [(2012), Ter ou Não Ter. Uma Breve História da Desigualdade, Lisboa, Bertrand].
Neri, Marcelo (2012), A Nova Classe Média, São Paulo, Saraiva.
Norris, Pippa & Inglehart, Ronald (2019), Cultural Backlash. Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Nunes, N. et al (2024) Understanding inequality for European inclusion in SDG 10 of the 2030 United Nations Agenda, Kraeger P. Islam, M.R. & Philips, R. (Eds). Social (In)equality, Community Well-being and Quality of Life, Elgar Online, pp. 79-123. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035312450.00010
Nunes, Nuno (2013), Desigualdades Sociais e Práticas de Ação Coletiva na Europa, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
Observatório da Deficiência e Direitos Humanos (2023), Pessoas com Deficiência em Portugal: Indicadores de Direitos Humanos 2023, Instituto Superior de Ciências Sociais e Políticas - Universidade de lisboa
OECD (2019), Under Pressure: The Squeezed Middle Class
OECD (2018), A Broken Social Elevator? How to Promote Social Mobility.
Oesch, Daniel and Rodríguez Menés, J. (2011) Upgrading or polarization? Occupational change in Britain, Germany, Spain and Switzerland, 1990-2008, Socio-Economic Review 9 (3): 503-531
Piketty, Thomas (2022), A Brief History of Equality, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press [2022, Uma Breve História da Igualdade, Lisboa, Temas e Debates & Círculo de Leitores]
Piketty, Thomas (2014 [2013]), Capital in the Twenty-First Century, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press [2014, O Capital no Século XXI, Lisboa, Temas e Debates & Círculo de Leitores]
Pintassilgo, S & R. Mauritti (2025). O lugar da mulher na sociedade guineense: a tematização de diálogos multissituados de ensino/aprendizagem. In: P.A. Pardal (org.) Estudos Sobre a Igualdade e a Inclusão. AAFDL Editora, pp. 75-107.
Pinto, José Madureira e Virgílio Borges Pereira (orgs.) (2008), Desigualdades, Desregulação e Riscos nas Sociedades Contemporâneas, Porto, Afrontamento.
Reich, Robert B. (2015), Saving Capitalism, For the Many, Not the Few, New York, A. A. Knopf.
Rodrigues, Carlos Farinha (coord.) (2016), Desigualdade de Rendimento e Pobreza em Portugal, Lisboa, FFMS.
Rodrigues, Carlos Farinha (coord.) (2012), Desigualdade Económica em Portugal, Lisboa, FFMS.
Roque, I. et al (2022) Precarious work and intermittent life trajectories in a Portuguese gig economy, Journal of Labor and Society. DOI: https://dx.doi.org/10.1163/24714607-bja10075
Saleiro, Sandra Palma e Catarina Sales de Oliveira (2018), “Desigualdades de (cis e trans)género. Portugal no contexto europeu”, em Renato Miguel do Carmo e outros (orgs), Desigualdades Sociais. Portugal e a Europa, Lisboa, Mundos Socais, pp. 131-147.
Sarroeira, R.; Henriques, J.; Sousa, A.M.; Ferreira da Silva, C.; Nunes, N.; Moro, S.; Botelho, M.C. (2023), Monitoring Sensors for Urban Air Quality: The Case of the Municipality of Lisbon. Sensors, 23, 7702. https://doi.org/10.3390/s23187702
Savage, M et al (2015), Social Class in the 21th Century, Pelican
Savage, Mike (2021), The Return of Inequality: Social Change and the Weight of the Past, Cambridge, Massachusetts, Harvard University Press.
Silva, Pedro Adão; Carmo, Renato Miguel; Cantante, Frederico; Cruz, Catarina; Estêvão, Pedro; Manso, Luís; Pereira, Tiago Santos; Lamelas, Filipe (2020), Trabalho e desigualdades no Grande Confinamento (II) (Estudos CoLABOR, N.º3/junho de 2020), CoLABOR, Disponível em https://colabor.pt/wp-content/uploads/2020/06/Trabalho-e-Desigualdades-no-Grande-Confinamento-II.pdf
Sen, Amartya (2009), The Idea of Justice, Cambridge (Mass.), Harvard University Press [(2010), A Ideia de Justiça, Coimbra, Almedina].
Standing, Guy (2011), The Precariat, London, Bloomsbury [(2014), O Precariado, Lisboa, Presença].
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2015), The Great Divide, New York, W. W. Norton [(2018), O Fim da Desigualdade, Lisboa, Bertrand].
Stiglitz, Joseph E. (2012), The Price of Inequality, New York, W. W. Norton [(2013), O Preço da Desigualdade, Lisboa, Bertrand].
Therborn, Göran (2020), Inequality and the Labyrinths of Democracy, London.
Therborn, G. (2021), Two epochal turns of inequality, their significance, and their dynamics, Journal of Chinese Sociology, 8, 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40711-021-00143-0.
Therborn, G. (2023). The pandemic experience and the post-pandemic world prospects. Thesis Eleven. https://doi.org/10.1177/07255136231188176
Tilly, Charles (2005), “Historical perspectives on inequality”, in Mary Romero and Eric Margolis (eds.), The Blackwell Companion to Social Inequalities, Malden, Blackwell: 15-30
Torres, Anália (coord.) (2018), Igualdade de Género ao Longo da Vida. Portugal no contexto europeu, Lisboa, FFMS.
UNDP (2019), Beyond income, beyond averages, beyond today: Inequalities in human development in the 21st century, Human Development Report 2019.
Wacquant, Loïc (2008), Urban Outcasts. A Comparative Sociology of Advanced Marginality, Cambridge, Polity.
Wagner, Anne-Catherine (2007), Les Classes Sociales dans la Mondialisation, Paris, La Découverte.
Wilkinson, Richard & Pickett, Kate (2018), The Inner Level. How More Equal Societies Reduce Stress, Restore Sanity and Improve Everyone’s Well-being, London, Allen Lane.
Wilkinson, Richard & Pickett, Kate (2009), The Spirit Level. Why More Equal Societies Almost Always Do Better, London, Allen Lane [(2010) O Espírito da Igualdade. Por Que Razão Sociedades Igualitárias Funcionam Quase Sempre Melhor, Lisboa, Presença].
Research Design
At the end of the CU students should be able to:
1) recognize and use different types of methodological strategies, mastering its theoretical, methodological and technical requirements, in order to make adequate choices;
2) identify central problems in research design, from problem definition to conceptualisation, operationalization, observation and proposal writing;;
3) write a research and/or intervention project proposal.
1. Research as a producer of knowledge to know and/or to intervene.
1.1. Empirical research as theoretically oriented.
1.2. Research as problem solving: diagnosis, evaluation, intervention.
1.3. Ethics in different types of research.
2. How to design a research project and/or intervention.
2.1. Formulation of the problem and definition of objectives.
2.2. Conceptualization.
2.3. Operationalization and observation.
2.4. Project's design.
3. Methodological strategies.
3.1. Adequacy of the methodological strategies to the objectives of tthe research.
3.2. Extensive research: large surveys, statistical databases, etc..
3.3. Intensive research: case studies, field research, participant observation, ethnographic approach, etc.
3.4. Action research and social intervention.
3.5. Comparative research: objectives and problems of comparison.
3.6. Mixed methods.
The learning process proceeds trough theoretical-practical classes, seminar presentations and debate (which are given prevalence), tutorials and students' autonomous work.
|
Evaluation along the semester, comprising the following components:
(a) Class participation and presentation of the research and/or intervention project (35%)
b) Final written work: research project and/or intervention (65%).
OR
Final assessment, consisting of a final written work: research project and/or intervention, complemented with an oral discussion, if the teacher considers necessary (100%).
The evaluation of this course does not include a final exam.
Ragin, C2019Constructing social research.Pine Forge.
Quivy, R&Champenhoud,L2003Manual de Investigação em Ciências Sociais.Gradiva.
Leedy, P. D., & Ormrod, J. E. 2023 Practical Research: Planning and Design. Pearson.
Della Porta, D&M Keating, eds 2008 Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences.CUP.
Creswell, JW 2003 Research design: qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches.Sage.
Chen, H 2015 Practical program evaluation: theory-driven evaluation and the integrated evaluation perspective.Sage.
Capucha, L 2008 Planeamento e avaliação de projectos: guião prático.DGIDC.
Campenhoudt, L van 2003 Introdução à análise dos fenómenos sociais.Gradiva.
Booth, Wayne C. et al 2016 The Craft of Research.The University of Chicago Press.
Burgess, R 2001 A pesquisa de terreno.Celta.
Bryman, A 2016 Social Research Methods.UP.
Blaikie, N 2007 Approaches to social enquiry.Polity Press.
Alasuutari, P, Bickman, L., and Brannen, J. 2008 Sage Handbook on Social Research Methods. Sage.
Whyte, William Foote (ed.) (1991) Participatory Action Research. London: Sage Publications.
Turner, Jonathan (2005) "A new approach for theoretically integrating micro and macro analysis", in Craig Calhoun, C. Rojek,B. Turner (Ed.) , The Sage Handbook of Sociology. London: Sage Publications.
Roberts, B. 2007 Getting the Most Out of the Research Experience. London: Sage.
Turner, F J. (2005). Social Work Diagnosis in Contemporary Practice. New York, Oxford: University Press.
Silverman, D (ed.) (2011) Qualitative Research. London: Sage.
Scott, J. (1990) A Matter of Record: Documentary Sources in Social Research. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schiefer, U, et al. (2007) Método aplicado de planeamento e Avaliação. Manual de Planeamento e Avaliação de Projectos. Estoril: Editora Principia.
Ragin, C C. (1987) The Comparative Method: Moving Beyond Qualitative and Quantitative Strategies. Berkeley/Los Angeles/London: University of California Press.
Oyen, Else (1990) Comparative methodology. Theory and practice in international social research. London: Sage.
Patton, M. (2018) Facilitating evaluation: principles in practice. Sage Thousand Oaks.
Kettner, P., Moroney, R. & Martin, L. (2016). Designing and managing programs: an effectiveness-based approach. (5nd. Ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Iphofen, R., Ed. (2020) Handbook of Research Ethics and Scientific Integrity. Springer.
Ghiglione, R & Matalon, B (1992) O Inquérito. Teoria e Prática. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
Foddy, William (1996) Como perguntar. Teoria e Prática da construção de perguntas para entrevistas e questionários. Oeiras: Celta Editora.
European Institute of Public Administration (2004) Improving an organization through self-assessment? common assessment framework. Maastricht: European Institute of Public Administration.
Dogan, M & Pelassy, D (1990, 1984) How to Compare Nations. Strategies in Comparative Politics. New Jersey: Chatham House Publishers.
Carvalho, H (2004) Análise Multivariada de Dados Qualitativos. Lisboa: Sílabo.
Calley, N. (2011). Program development in the 21st Century: an evidence-based approach to design, implementation and evaluation. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Brannen, J (2005) Mixed methods research: a discussion paper, Economic & Social Research Council, National Centre for Research Methods. URL: http://eprints.ncrm.ac.uk/89/1/MethodsReviewPaperNCRM-005.pdf
Brady, H E & Collier, D (2004) Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools Shared Standards. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers.
Booth, W C, Colomb, G G e Williams, J M (2003) The Craft of Research. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Bertaux, D. (2020) As narrativas de vida. Lisboa: Mundos Sociais.
Beckett, C (2010) Assessment and intervention in social work. Sage Publications: London.
Na medida em que o desenho de pesquisa pode ter algumas especificidades em função da área científica de pesquisa, listam-se abaixo algumas sugestões de suporte bibliográfico.
Becker, Howard S. (2017) Evidence, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Mestrado em Sociologia
Shaw, I, Briar-Lawson, K, Orme, J & Ruckdeschel, R 2010 The Sage Handbook of Social Work Research. Londres: Sage.
Hardwick, L et al (eds) 2017 Innovations in Social Work Research. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.
Bell, L 2017 Research methods for Social Workers. Londres: Palgrave.
Mestrado em Serviço Social
Toshkov, D 2016 Research Design in Political Science. London: Palgrave.
Howard, C 2017 Thinking Like a Political Scientist: A Practical Guide to Research Methods. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Filho, Dalson Britto Figueiredo; Paranhos, Ranulfo; Rocha, Enivaldo Carvalho da; Silva Junior, José Alexandre da; Santos, Manoel Leonardo Wanderley Duarte 2012 Levando Gary King a Sério: Desenhos de Pesquisa em Ciência Política. In Revista Eletrônica de Ciência Política 3 (1-2), pp. 86-117.
Capucha, L. e Caramelo, S. (2024). Ciências Sociais Aplicadas - Planeamento e Avaliação de Políticas Públicas. Coimbra: Almedina.
Bukve, O 2019 Designing Social Science Research. Cham: Palgrave.
Mestrado em Políticas Públicas
Treadwell, D, & Davis, A 2016 Introducing communication research: Paths of inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 3ª ed.
Silverman, D. (2017) Doing Qualitative Research. Londres: Sage. https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/doing-qualitative-research/book251108
Quan-Haase, A., & Sloan, L. (eds.). 2022 The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage.
Kubitschko, S., & Kaun, A. (eds). 2016 Innovative methods in media and communication research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hine, C. (2017). Digital Ethnography. In The Wiley-Blackwell Encyclopedia of Social Theory, B.S. Turner (Ed.).
Berger, A. A. 2018 Media and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Mestrado em Gestão dos Novos Media
Klotz, A & Prakash, D (eds) 2008 Qualitative methods in International Relations: A pluralist guide. New York: Palgrave (v. plataforma moodle).
Sprinz, D F & Wolinsky, Y (eds.) 2004 Cases, numbers and models: International Relations research methods. Ann Arbor: Michigan University Press. (Em linha: https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/89c3/34b5c514acb817b8862dcdf675bd7d4863de.pdf
https://uk.sagepub.com/sites/default/files/upm-binaries/71316_Lamont_Research_Methods_in_International_Relations_Chapter_1.pdf).
Lamont, C 2015 Research methods in International Relations. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications (capitulo 1 on-line em:
Mestrado em Estudos Internacionais
Stein, T. S., Bathurst, J. R., & Lasher, R. 2022 Performing arts management: A handbook of professional practices. Simon and Schuster.
Quan-Haase, A., & Sloan, L. (Eds.). 2022 The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage.
Osterwalder, A., & Pigneur, Y. 2010 Business model generation: a handbook for visionaries, game changers, and challengers (Vol. 1). John Wiley & Sons.
Mestrado em Estudos e Gestão da Cultura
Zeleza, T (ed) 2007 The study of Africa. The global and transnational engagements (Vol II). Dakar: CODESRIA.
Zeleza, T (ed) 2006 The Study of Africa. Disciplinary and interdisciplinary encounters (Vol I). Dakar: CODESRIA.
Ouédraogo, J-B & Cardoso, C (ed) 2011 Readings in methodology: African Perspectives. Dakar: CODESRIA. Em linha: https://www.codesria.org/spip.php?article1502&lang=en
Mestrado em Estudos Africanos
Amado, J. (Org.). (2013). Manual de investigação qualitativa em educação. Coimbra: Imprensa da UC.
Bogdan, R & Biklen, S 1994 Investigação qualitativa em educação: uma introdução à teoria e aos métodos. Porto: Porto Editora.Cohen, L., Manion, L., & Morrison, K. (2007). Research methods in education (6th Ed.). London: Routledge.
Dal-Farra, R. A. & Lopes P. T. C. (2013). Métodos mistos de pesquisa em educação: pressupostos teóricos, Nuances: estudos sobre Educação, 24(3), 67-80.
Gay, L., Mills, G., & Airasian, P. (2012). Educational research. Competencies for analysis and applications. Columbus, OH: Pearson.
Tuckman, B. (2005). Manual de investigação em Educação. Lisboa: F.C.G.
Mestrado em Educação e Sociedade
Treadwell, D, & Davis, A 2016 Introducing communication research: Paths of inquiry. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications, 3ª ed.
Quan-Haase, A., & Sloan, L. (eds.). 2022 The SAGE handbook of social media research methods. Sage.
Kubitschko, S., & Kaun, A. (eds). 2016 Innovative methods in media and communication research. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.
Berger, A. A. 2018 Media and communication research methods: An introduction to qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: SAGE Publications.
Mestrado em Comunicação, Cultura e Tecnologias da Informação
Se necessário, solicitar referências adicionais ao/à(s) docente(s).
Mestrado em Ciências do Trabalho e Relações Laborais
Pollock III, Philip H.& Edwards, B C 2019 The Essentials of political analysis. 6ªed., Washington D.C.: CQ Press.
Silverman, D (2018) Doing qualitative research. Los Angeles: Sage.
Johnson, J B & Reynolds, H T 2020 Political Science research methods, 9ª ed. Los Angeles: Sage.
Mestrado em Ciência Política
Se necessário, solicitar referências adicionais ao/à(s) docente(s).
Mestrado em Administração Escolar
Se necessário, solicitar referências adicionais ao/à(s) docente(s).
Mestrado em Ação Humanitária
Sociology of Modernity
The learning objectives are:
- knowledge of major theories and concepts of modernity and change;
- knowledge of specific aspects of contemporary society based on these concepts and theories;
- skills in the analysis of change processes and the use of documentary and statistical sources, national and international;
- ability to interpret text and data, to develop reasoned arguments, to communicate orally and in writing, and working individually and in teams.
1. "Modernity" in sociology
1.1 Class struggle, organic solidarity, rational action
1.2 Modernization, advanced modernity, multiple modernities
1.3 Structure, action - reproduction and change
2. Processes of change in contemporary societies
2.1 Inequality and social composition
2.2 Social values
2.3 Civic and political action
2.4 Science, culture and innovation
2.5 Global institutional indexes
3. Sociology in modernity
3.1 Modernity and sociological reflexivity
3.2 Sociology, social reflexivity, change
The lectures will be essentially displayed by the teacher, and the theory-practice classes will involve group presentation and discussion of a text and/or empirical data by the Master's students, with the teacher's monitoring. Master's students must participate in classes, explore systematically the literature, explain and discuss the themes selected from the theoretical and practical lessons, and do the individual final written work. The tutorial guidance is developed throughout the semester.
|
The evaluation process involves:
- A final individual written work, regarding the content of the program (maximum size of 10 pages, Arial 12, 1 space and a half);
- The presentation and discussion of theoretical texts or empirical papers;
- class participation, and attendance.
These evaluation elements are weighted as follows in the final grade: attendance and class participation: 20%; presentation and discussion of texts in practical classes: 30%; individual written work: 50%.
Abrams, P. (1982), Historical Sociology, Somerset, Open Books.
Boudon, R. (1984), "As teorias da mudança social", em O Lugar da Desordem, Lisboa, Gradiva, pp. 15-50.
Eisenstadt, S. N. (2001), "Modernidades múltiplas", Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, nº 35, pp. 139-163.
Habermas, J. (1981), "Modernity versus Post-modernity" (Modernity - an incomplete project), New German Critique, 22, pp. 3-14.
Martucelli, D. (1999), Sociologies de la Modernité, Gallimard.
Mouzelis, N. (2008), Modern and Postmodern Social Theorizing - Bridging the Divide, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Nisbet, R. (1994), History of the Idea of Progress, New Brunswick, London, Transaction Publishers.
Skocpol, T. (1984), "Emerging agendas and recurrent strategies", em Vision and Method in Historical Sociology, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Wagner, P. (2016), Progress: A Reconstruction, Kindle Edn. Cambridge, Polity.
Wilkinson, R., e K. Pickett (2010) O Espírito da Igualdade. Por Que Razão Sociedades Igualitárias Funcionam Quase Sempre Melhor, Lisboa, Presença.
Wieviorka, Michel (2003), "Os movimentos «antimundialização»", em José Rebelo (coord.), Novas Formas de Mobilização Popular, Porto, Campo das Letras.
White, L. (1959), The Evolution of Culture, New York, McGraw Hill.
Weber, M. (1977, 1904), Sobre a Teoria das Ciências Sociais, Lisboa, Editorial Presença.
Ward, L. (1883), Dynamic Sociology, New York, D. Appleton and Company.
Wallerstein, Immanuel (1990), O Sistema Mundial Moderno, Porto, Edições Afrontamento.
Global Social Science, Leiden, Brill. pp. 227-242.
(eds.), The Benefit of Broad Horizons: Intellectual and Institutional Preconditions for a
Wagner, P. (2010), ?Towards a world Sociology of modernity?, in H. Joas, e B. Klein
Wagner, P. (1994), A Sociology of Modernity ? Liberty and Discipline, London, Routledge.
Wagner, A.-C. (2007), Les Classes Sociales dans la Mondialisation, Paris, La Découverte.
Viegas, José Manuel Leite, Ana Maria Belchior e Filipa Seiceira (2010), "Mudanças e continuidades no modelo de participação política em Portugal. Análise comparada europeia", Perspectivas - Portuguese Journal of Political Science and International Relations, Número 5: Cidadãos, Parlamentos e Representação Política, Lisboa, NICPRI, Centro FCT, pp. 17-42
United Nations Development Programme (2003), A World of Development. Annual Report 2003 (http://www.undp.org/annualreports/2003/english/)
Touraine, Alain (1970), A Sociedade Pós-Industrial, Lisboa, Moraes Editores.
Tiryakian, E. A. (ed.) (2013), Sociological Theory, Values and Sociocultural Change ? Essays in Honor of Pitirim A. Sorokin, New Brunswick, Transaction Publishers.
Therborn, G. (1996), European Modernity and Beyond - The trajectory of European Societies 1945-2000, Sage Publisinhg.
Transformation, Evolution, New York, St. Martin?s Press, pp. 49-72.
Therborn, G (2000), ??Modernization? discourses, their limitations, and their alternatives? in K. Schelkle e E. Kholi (eds.), Paradigms of Social Change: Modernization, Development,
Sztompka, P. (1998), A Sociologia da Mudança Social, Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira.
Steinmetz, G. (2011), "Bourdieu, historicity and Historical Sociology", Cultural Sociology, vol 5 (1), pp. 45-66.
Steinmetz, G. (ed) (2013), Sociology and Empire. The Imperial Entanglements of a Discipline, Durham, NC, Duke University Press.
Steinmetz, G. (2017), ?Field Theory and Interdisciplinary: Relations between History and Sociology in Germany and France during the Twentieth Century.? Comparative Studies in Society and History", vol. 59, no. 2.
Steinmetz, G. (2018), "The crisis of history and the history of crisis: historical sociology as a 'crisis science'", Comparative and Historical Sociology, American SociologicalAssociation.
Spencer, H. (1972), On Social Evolution (ed. J. D. Y Peel), Chicago, Chicago University Press.
policopiado.
Silva, A. S. (s/d), ?Alguns temas para pensar a mudança social?, Mestrado em Ciências da Educação da Faculdade de Psicologia e de Ciências da Educação do Porto (1992-3),
Servon, Lisa J. (2002), Bridging the Digital Divide: Technology, Community and Public Policy, Oxford, Blackwell.
Scott, J. C. (1998), Seeing Like a State, Yale University Press.
Schmidt, V. H. (2006), "Multiple modernities or varieties of modernity?", Current Sociology, 54 (1), pp. 77-97.
Schiller, Dan (1999), Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Rodrigues, Eduardo Vítor (2010), "O Estado e as Políticas Sociais em Portugal", Sociologia: Revista do Departamento de Sociologia da FLUP, Vol. XX, pp. 191-230.
Ritzer, G. (2008), The MacDonaldization of Society, Pine Forge Press, California.
Reich, Robert (1996), O Trabalho das Nações: Preparando-nos para o Capitalismo do séc. XXI, Lisboa, Quetzal Editores.
Raford, N., e A. Trabulsi (2015), Warlords, Inc., North Atlantic Books, California.
Price, Monroe (2002), Media & Sovereignty: the Global Information Revolution and its Challenge to State Power, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Polanyi, Karl (1980) A Grande Transformação: as Origens da Nossa Época, Rio de Janeiro, Edições Capus.
Piketty, T. (2014), O Capital no Século XXI, Lisboa, Temas e Debates.
Pierson, Paul (ed.) (2001), The New Politics of Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Parsons, Talcott (1966), Societies: Evolutionary and Comparative Perspectives, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
Parsons, Talcott (1971), The System of Modern Societies, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, Prentice-Hall.
Osborne, Stephen P. (ed.) (2008), The Third Sector in Europe - Prospects and Challenges, Routledge.
Nye, Joseph S., e John D. Donahue (eds.) (2000), Governance in a Globalizing World, Washington, Brookings Institution Press.
Nowotny, H., P. Scott, e M. Gibbons (2003), "Mode 2 revisited: the new production of knowledge", Minerva, 41, pp. 179-194.
Norris, P. e R. Inglehart (2019), Cultural Backlash: Trump, Brexit, and Authoritarian Populism, New York, Cambridge University Press.
Noble, Carolyn (2004), "Postmodern thinking - where is it taking social work?", Journal of Social Work, 4(3), pp. 289-304.
Nisbet, R (1979), ?Introducción: el problema del cambio social?, in R. Nisbet (ed.), Cambio Social, Madrid, Allianza, pp. 12-51.
Mouzelis, N. (1999), "Modernity: a non-european conceptualization", The British Journal of Sociology, pp. 141-159.
Mouzelis, N. (1999); "Exploring post-traditional orders: individual reflexivity, 'pure relations' and duality of structure", em M. O'Brien et al (eds.), Theorising Modernity, London, Longman.
Mouzakitis, A. (2017), "Modernity and the idea of progress", Frontiers in Sociology, vol. 2 (3).
Marx, K., e F. Engels (1975, 1933), A Ideologia Alemã, Lisboa, Presença.
Martinelli, A. (2005), "From world system to world society?", Journal of World-Systems Research, vol. XI, nº 2, pp. 241-260.
Mann, M. (2018), "Have wars and violence declined?", Theory and Society, 47-1, pp. 37-60.
Maanen, J. V. (1991), "The smile factory: work at Disneyland" in P. J. Frost et al, Reframing Organizational Culture, Sage Publications, pp. 58-76.
Lopes, J. T. (2003) ?Da impossibilidade da revolução. Breve contributo sobre Bourdieu e os conceitos de luta e de mudança social?, Forum Sociológico, II Série, 9/10, pp. 87-89.
Lopes, J. T. (2012), ?Da especificidade da sociologia na transformação do mundo?, em Casa-Nova, M. J., A. Benavente, F. Diogo, C. Estêvão, J. T. Lopes, Cientistas Sociais e Responsabilidade Social no Mundo Actual, Vila Nova de Famalicão, Húmus.
Latour, Bruno (1993), We Have Never Been Modern, Harvard, Harvard University Press.
Lachmann, R. (2010), States and Power. Polity Press.
Lachmann, R. (2013), What Is Historical Sociology? Polity Press.
Lachmann, R. (2016), "Neoliberalism, the origins of the global crisis, and the future of states", in G. Hooks (ed.), The Sociology of Development Handbook, University of California Press, pp. 463-84.
King, A. (2007). The Sociology of Sociology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 37(4), 501?524.
Katz, James E., e Ronald E. Price (2002), Social Consequences of Internet Use: Access, Involvement, and Interaction, Cambridge, MIT Press.
Inglehart, Ronald (1990), Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
Hobsbawm, E. (1996), The Age of Extremes: a History of the World, 1914-1991, Vintage.
Habermas, J., e S. B.-H. (1981), ?Modernity versus Postmodernity?, New German Critique, No. 22, pp. 3-14.
Habermas, J. (1981), The Theory of Communicative Action, Boston, Beacon Press.
Habermas, J. (1990), The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1991), The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere:an Inquiry into a Category of Bourgeois Society, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Graham, Stephen, e Simon Marvin (2001), Splintering Urbanism: Networked Infrastructures, Technological Mobilities and the Urban Condition, London, Routledge.
Goodwin, R. E., M. Rein, e M. Moran (2006), "The public and its policies", em M. Moran, M. Rein, e R. E. Goodwin (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Public Policy, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp. 3-38.
Giddens, A. (1996), "In defence of sociology", em In Defence of Sociology - Essays, Interpretations and Rejoinders, Cambridge, Polity Press, pp.1-7.
Giddens, A. (1995), As Consequências da Modernidade, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Giddens, Anthony (1995), As Consequências da Modernidade, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Fortuna, C. (org.) (1997), Cidade, Cultura e Globalização, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Elias, N. (1989), O Processo Civilizacional, vols. 1 e 2, Lisboa, Publicações D. Quixote.
Eder, Klaus (1993), The New Politics of Class, London, Sage Publications.
Durkheim, É. (1984, 1893), A Divisão do Trabalho Social, Lisboa, Presença.
Dorling, D. (2010), Injustice: Why Social Inequality Persists, Bristol, The Policy Press.
Internationalist.
Dorling, D. (2017), The Equality Effect. Improving Life for Everyone, Oxford, New
Crouch, C. (2004), Post-Democracy, New Jersey, Wiley.
Costa, António Firmino da (2012), "Desigualdades globais", Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, nº 68, pp. 9-32.
Comte, A. (1907), Cours de Philosophie Positive, Paris, Schleicher Frères.
Clark, John (2003), Globalizing Civic Engagement, Civil Society and Transnational Action, London, Earthscan Publishers.
Castells, Manuel (1996), The Information Age: Economy, Society and Culture, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers.
Casanova, J. L., M. das D. Guerreiro, e I. Pervova (2018), ?Contemporary changes and civil society in Portugal and the Russian Federation?, European Politics and Society, pp. 2-19.
Casanova, José Luís (s/d), "Crisis and cultural change: the countries with adjustment programmes in the European Union", Comparative Sociology (em revisão).
Casanova, José Luís, e João Ferreira de Almeida (2021), ?When democracy incubates inequality and heteronomy ? authoritarianism and nationalism in the European Union?, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, n.º 96, 2021, pp. 9-40.
Burawoy, M. (2005), "For public sociology", American Sociological Review, vol. 70, 1, pp. 4-28.
Burawoy, M. (2010), "Facing an Unequal World: Challenges for a Global Sociology", em Burawoy, M. et al (eds.), Facing an Unequal World: Challenges for a Global Sociology, Institute of Sociology, Academia Sinica, pp. 3-28.
Bourdieu, P. (1992), Les Règles de l?Art, Paris, Seuil.
Bourdieu, P. (2001), "Avant-propos", "Pourquoi les sciences sociales doivent se prendre pour object", "Conclusion", em Science de la Science et Réflexivité, Paris, Éditions Raisons D'Agir, pp. 5-8, 167-184, 221-223.
Bourdieu, P. e L. J. D. Wacquant (1992), An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology, Chicago, The University of Chicago Press.
Bonny, Y. (2004), Sociologie du Temps Présent: Modernité Avancée ou Postmodernité?, Paris, Armand Colin.
Benner, Chris (2002), Work in the New Economy Flexible Labor Markets in Silicon Valley, Oxford, Blackwell.
Bendix, R. (1967), ?Tradition and modernity reconsidered?, Comparative Studies in Society and History, 9 (3), pp. 292-346.
Bell, Daniel (1973), The Coming of Post-Industrial Society: A Venture in Social Forecasting, New York, Basic Books.
Beck, U., A. Giddens, e S. Lash (1994), Reflexive Modernization, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Beck, Ulrich (1992), Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity, London, Sage Publications.
Bhambra, Gurminder K. (2007), Rethinkig Modernity - Postcolonialism and the Sociological Imagination, Palgrave Macmillan.
Bauman, Zygmunt (2000), Liquid Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Barnes, W., e N. Gilman (2015), "The politics of a post-climate-change world", in Raford, N., e A. Trabulsi, Warlords, Inc., North Atlantic Books, California.
Amable, Bruno (2005), Les Cinq Capitalismes. Diversité des Systèmes Économiques et Sociaux dans la Mondialisation, Paris Seuil.
Almeida, J. F. de, F. L. Machado, e A. F. da Costa (2006) ?Social classes and values in Europe, Portuguese Journal of Social Sciences, 5 (2), pp. 95-117.
Alexander, J. (2013), The Dark Side of Modernity, Cambridge, Polity Press.
Alexander, J, e Piotr Sztompka (eds.) (2002), Rethinking Progress ? Movements, Forces and Ideas at the End of the Twetieth Century, London, Taylor& Francis.
Alexander, J. (1994), ?Modern, Anti, Post and Neo: how social theories have tried to undestand the ?new world? of ?our time?, Zeitschrift fu?r Soziologie, 23-3, pp. 165-197
Alexander, J. (2016), ?Progress and disillusion: civil repair and its discontents?, Thesis Eleven, vol. 137 (I), pp. 72-82.
? Politics, History and Sociology, Durham, Duke Universty Press, pp. 1-71.
Adams, J., E. Clemens, e A. S. Orloff (2003), ?Social theory, modernity, and the three waves of historical sociology?, in J. Adams, E. Clemens, e A. S. Orloff (eds.), Remaking Modernity
GERAL
Wall, Karin (org.) (2005), Famílias em Portugal, Lisboa, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais, pp. 51-81.
Viegas, José Manuel Leite, e António Firmino da Costa (orgs.) (1998), Portugal: Que Modernidade? Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Viegas, José Manuel Leite, e Sérgio Faria (2007), "Participação política - o caso português numa perspectiva comparativa europeia", em J. M. L. Viegas, H. Carreiras e A. Malamud (orgs.), Instituições e Política - Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. I, Oeiras, Celta Editora, pp. 59-76.
Portuguese Journal of Political Science and International Relations, Número 5: Cidadãos, Parlamentos e Representação Política, Lisboa, NICPRI, Centro FCT, pp. 17-42.
Viegas, J. M. L., A. M. Belchior e F. Seiceira (2010), "Mudanças e continuidades no modelo de participação política em Portugal. Análise comparada europeia", Perspectivas -
Silva, A. S. (2017), ?Sociologia e política pública?, Análise Social, 225, LII (4º), pp.782-803.
Sebastião, João, e S. V. Correia (2007), "A democratização do ensino em Portugal", em J. M. L. Viegas, H. Carreiras e A. Malamud (orgs.), Instituições e Política - Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. I, Oeiras, Celta Editora, pp. 107-136.
Santos, Boaventura Sousa (org.) (2001), A Sociedade Portuguesa Perante os Desafios da Globalização, Porto, Edições Afrontamento.
Rodrigues, M. de L., e P. A. e Silva (orgs.) (2014), Políticas Públicas em Portugal, Lisboa, Imprensa Nacional Casa da Moeda-ISCTE-IUL.
Rodrigues, M. de L. (org.) (2014), 40 Anos de Políticas de Educação em Portugal, vol. I - A Construção do Sistema Democrático de Ensino, Lisboa, Almedina.
Rodrigues, M. de L. (org.) (2015), 40 Anos de Políticas de Educação em Portugal, vol. II - Conhecimento, Actores, Recursos, Lisboa, Almedina.
Rodrigues, M. de L., e M. Heitor (org.) (2015), 40 Anos de Políticas de Ciência e de Ensino Superior, Lisboa, Almedina.
pp. 191-230.
Rodrigues, E. V. (2010), "O Estado e as políticas sociais em Portugal", Sociologia, Vol. XX,
Reis, António (coord.) (2000), Portugal, Anos 2000: Retrato de um País em Mudança, Lisboa, Círculo de Leitores e Comissariado de Portugal para a Expo 2000 de Hannover.
Reis, António (coord.) (1994), Portugal: 20 Anos de Democracia, Lisboa, Círculo de Leitores.
Pires, Rui Pena (1987), "Diferença e progresso: a tipologia tradicional/moderno na sociologia do desenvolvimento", Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, nº3, pp. 149-162.
Pinto, José Madureira (2008), "Desregulação da economia, menos Estado Social?", em J. M. Pinto, e V. B. Pereira, Desigualdades, Desregulação e Riscos nas Sociedades Contemporâneas, Porto, Edições Afrontamento, pp. 105-136.
Pinto, António Costa (org.) (2000), Portugal Contemporâneo, Madrid, Ediciones Sequitur.
Gradiva.
Peixoto, J., I. T. de Oliveira, J. Azevedo, J. C. Marques, P. Góis, J. Malheiros, P. M. Madeira (orgs.) (2016), Regresso Ao Futuro: A Nova Emigração e a Sociedade Portuguesa, Lisboa,
Oliveira, Luísa (2003), "A construção social dos mundos e dos actores de inovação em Portugal", em A Mão Visível da Inovação. A Construção Social das Técnicas e dos Mercados, Lisboa, ISCTE, Tese de Doutoramento, pp. 155-203.
Godinho, Manuel Mira, e João Caraça (1999), O Futuro Tecnológico. Perspectivas para a Inovação em Portugal, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Godinho, Manuel Mira (2007), "Indicadores de C&T, inovação e conhecimento: Onde estamos? Para onde Vamos?", Análise Social, 182, pp. 239-274.
Freire, João (2007), "Transformações e resistências: técnica, economia e sociedade", em A. F. da Costa, F. L. Machado, e P. Ávila (orgs.), Sociedade e Conhecimento - Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. II, Oeiras, Celta Editora, pp. 123-144.
Freire, André e Pedro Magalhães (2002), A Abstenção Eleitoral em Portugal, 1975-2001. Uma Introdução Comparativa, Lisboa, Instituto de Ciências Sociais.
Costa, António Firmino da, et ali (2005), "Pode a cultura científica ser objecto de um movimento social?", "O programa Ciência Viva", "Conclusão", em Cultura Científica e Movimento Social, pp. 7-14, 15-32, 113-116.
Costa, António Firmino da, F. L. Machado, e J. F. de Almeida (2007), "Classes sociais e recursos educativos: uma análise transnacional", em A. F. da Costa, F. L. Machado, e P. Ávila (orgs.), Sociedade e Conhecimento - Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. II, Oeiras, Celta Editora, pp. 5-20.
Casanova, José Luís (2007), "Estrutura, orientações sociais e projectos societais", em A. F. da Costa, F. L. Machado, e P. Ávila (orgs.), Sociedade e Conhecimento - Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. II, Oeiras, Celta Editora, pp. 165-189.
Cardoso, Gustavo, M. do C. Gomes, e C. P. Conceição (2007), "Práticas comunicacionais na sociedade em rede", em A. F. da Costa, F. L. Machado, e P. Ávila (orgs.), Sociedade e Conhecimento - Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. II, Oeiras, Celta Editora, pp. 45-60.
Capucha, Luís, E. Pegado, e S. P. Saleiro (2007), "Políticas de desenvolvimento social, emprego e segurança social", em J. M. L. Viegas, H. Carreiras e A. Malamud (orgs.), Instituições e Política - Portugal no Contexto Europeu, vol. I, Oeiras, Celta Editora, pp. 77-107.
Cabral, Manuel Villaverde (1997), Cidadania Política e Equidade Social em Portugal, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Barreto, António (1999), A Situação Social em Portugal II, Lisboa, Instituto de Ciências Sociais.
Almeida, João Ferreira de (1998), "Society and values", em A. C. Pinto (org.), Modern Portugal, The Society for the Promotion of Science and Scholarship, Inc., Palo Alto.
Almeida, J. F. (2013). Desigualdades e perspetivas dos cidadãos: Portugal e a Europa, Lisboa, Editora Mundos Sociais.
PORTUGAL
Institutions in Contemporary Societies
LO1) Introduction to the knowledge and problematics of institutions in contemporary societies.
LO2) Knowledge of different reference authors in the social sciences considered essential for understanding the role and importance of institutions in today's world.
LO3) Acquire the main theoretical, methodological and communicative tools of this field of social sciences, in particular sociology.
LO4) In-depth study of contemporary institutions in different fields and sectors (social, political, economic and cultural), at different levels of analysis (global, European, national and local) and in different spheres of intervention.
LO5) Identify, interpret and use national, international, digital and other statistical and documentary sources relevant to the field of study.
LO6) Develop general competences at 2nd cycle university level, namely the capacity for intellectual integration and professional use of theoretical, methodological and empirical knowledge.
Introduction - Concepts, theories, debates
i. Institution, institutionalization, social action
ii. Institutions in contemporary society
iii. The neo-institutionalism in the social sciences
I. State
1.1. Constitution and changes in welfare state
1.2. Challenges and tensions in the welfare regimes
1.3. Social justice and democracy: fairness and capability
II. Market
2.1. Economic and financial globalization
2.2. Risks and variants of capitalism
2.4. Relations between state and the market
III. Civil society
3.1. Family, community, citizenship
3.2. Social capital, associations, trust
3.3. Social movements, collective action, social networks
Assessment throughout the semester:
- Preparation and presentation of group work in class on theoretical and empirical topics related to the course syllabus, based on a critical reading of a scientific text indicated by the lecturer (40%);
- A written essay on the contents and topics covered in the syllabus, with consultation of selected texts from the UC bibliography (60%).
Assessment by exam:
- Students who opt for assessment by exam take a written test without consultation on the topics covered in the course syllabus. An oral discussion may be requested in addition to the written component.
*The assessment of the class in English will take place in a specific way to be defined by the teachers involved.
Berger, P., Luckmann Th. (2004 [1966]), A Construção Social da Realidade, Dinalivro; Carmo, R. M., Sebastião, J., Azevedo, J., Martins,S. C.,Costa, A. F. (2018), Desigualdades Sociais: Portugal e a Europa, Mundos Sociais; Carmo, R.M. (2024) Direito ao Mundo da Vida: Esboços Teóricos para Políticas Amplas. Lisboa, Tinta-da-China; Crouch, C. (2013), Making Capitalism Fit for Society, Polity. Della Porta, D. (2015), Social Movements in Times of Austerity, Polity; March, J. C. et al (2006), "Elaborating the 'new institucionalism'", em R. A. W. Rhodes et al (org.), The Oxford Handbook of Political Institutions, Oxford Univ. Press; Polanyi, K. (2012), A Grande Transformação, Edições 70; Piketty, T. (2022), Uma Breve História da Igualdade, Lisboa, Temas e Debates/Circulo Leitores; Sen, A. (2011), A Ideia de Justiça, Almedina; Veloso, L., e Carmo, R. M. (orgs.) (2012), A Constituição Social da Economia, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
ABREU, Alexandre et al (2013), A Crise a Troika e as Alternativas Urgentes, Lisboa, Tinta-da China.
AMABLE, Bruno (2003), The Diversity of Modern Capitalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
ACCORNERO, Guya e Pedro R. Pinto (2023) Movimentos de fronteira conflito e protesto em Portugal. Em: Fernandes, J. M. et al (Orgs.) O Essencial da Política Portuguesa, Tinta da china, pp. 562-578
BAERT, Patrick e Filipe Carreira da Silva (2014), Teoria Social Contemporânea, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
BARATA, André e Renato Miguel do Carmo, (2015), O Futuro nas Mãos: de Regresso à Política do Bem-Comum, Lisboa, Tinta-da-China.
BAUMAN, Zygmunt (2000), Modernidade líquida, Rio de Janeiro, Jorge Zahar Editor.
BECKER, Uwe (2013), ?Measuring change of capitalist varieties: reflection on Method, ilustrations from brics?, New Political Economy, 18 (4), 503-532.
BELL, Colin e Howard Newby (1971), Community Studies: an Introduction to the Sociology of Local Community, Londres, George Allen & Unwin.
BLOCK, Fred, e SOMERS, Margaret (2016), The Power of Market Fundamentalism: Karl Polanyi?s Critique, Harvard University Press.
BOHLE, Dorothee & Béla Greskovits (2012), Capitalist diversity on Europe’s periphery, Cornell University Press.
BOTELHO, Maria do Carmo, Rosário Mauritti, Nuno Nunes e Daniela Craveiro (2014), ?A mão esquerda e a mão direita do Estado português: que atuais tendências??, Observatório das Desigualdades, ISCTE-IUL, CIES-IUL, http://wp.me/p4h6tu-ki .
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1998), Contrafogos, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
BOURDIEU, Pierre (1980), ?Le capital social: notes provisoires?, Actes de la Recherche en Sciences Sociales, 31, pp. 2-3.
BRANCO, Rui (2022). Proteção Social no Portugal Democrático. FFMS
CALEIRAS, Jorge e Renato Miguel do Carmo (2022). A articulação das políticas de emprego e de proteção em Portugal. COLABOR
CARMO, Renato Miguel do, Jorge Caleiras, Isabel Roque, Rodrigo Viera de Assis (2023), O Mundo do Trabalho a Partir de Baixo: Retratos e Percursos, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais.
CARMO, Renato Miguel do; Inês Tavares; e Ana Filipa Cândido (orgs.) (2022), Que Futuro para a Igualdade? Pensar a Sociedade e o Pós-pandemia, Lisboa, Observatório das Desigualdades, CIES-Iscte
CARMO, Renato Miguel do, Jorge Caleiras, Isabel Roque, Rodrigo Viera de Assis (2021), O Trabalho Aqui e Agora: Crises, Percursos e Vulnerabilidades, Lisboa, Tinta da China.
CARMO, Renato Miguel, e Daniela Ferreira (2019), Resilience and transformation in times of economic crisis: The persistence of community in the Lisbon Metropolitan Area. Community Development. 50(5), 515-535.
CARMO, Renato Miguel do, e André Barata (2014), Estado Social: de Todos para Todos, Lisboa, Tinta-da-China.
CARMO, Renato Miguel, e Nuno Nunes (2013), "Class and social capital in Europe: a transnational analysis of the European Social Survey", European Societies 15 (3), pp. 373-387.
CARMO, Renato Miguel do (org.) (2011), Entre as Cidades e a Serra: Mobilidades, Capital Social e Associativismo no Interior Algarvio, Editora Mundos Sociais.
CARMO, Renato Miguel do, Daniel Melo e Ruy Llera Blanes, (coord.) (2008), A Globalização no Divã, Lisboa, Tinta-da-China.
CASTELLS, Manuel (2003), A Sociedade em Rede. A Era da Informação: Economia, Sociedade e Cultura, Vol. I, Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
CASTELLS, Manuel (2013), Redes de Indignação e Esperança: Movimentos Sociais na Era da Internet, Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
COLEMAN, James S. (1990), Foundations of Social Theory, Cambridge, MA, Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
CROUCH, Colin (2005), Capitalist Diversity and Change, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
CRUZ, M. B. (1989), Teorias Sociológicas I ? Antologia de Textos: os Fundadores e o Clássicos, Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian.
EDWARDS, B., M. W. Foley e M. Diani (eds.) (2001), Beyond Tocqueville: Civil Society and the Social Capital Debate in Comparative Perspective, New England, Tufts University.
ESPING-ANDERSEN, Gosta (1990), The Three Worlds of the Welfare Capitalism, Cambridge, Polity Press.
ESTÊVÃO, Pedro, Alexandre Calado e Luís Capucha (2017), “Resilience: moving from a heroic notion to a sociological concept”. Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 85, 9-25.
FERRERA, Maurizio (2000), ?A reconstrução do Estado Social na Europa meridional?, Análise Social, vol. 35, nº 151-152, pp. 457-476.
FIELD, John (2003), Social Capital, London, Routledge.
FLIGSTEIN, N. (2001), The architecture of Markets: An Economic Sociology of Twenty-First-Century Capitalist Societies, Princeton, Princeton University Press.
FRASER, Nancy (2008), Scales of Justice, Cambridge, Polity.
FUKUYAMA, Francis (2022), Liberalismo e seus Descontentes, Alfragide, D. Quixote.
FUKUYAMA, Francis (2006), A Construção de Estados: Governação, Ordem Mundial no Século XXI, Lisboa, Gradiva.
GIDDENS, Anthony (1994), Modernidade e Identidade Pessoal, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
GIDDENS, Anthony (1998), Sociologia, Lisboa, F.C.G.
GILBERT, Neil (2004), Transformation of the Welfare State, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
HABERMAS, Jürgen (2012), Um Ensaio sobre a Constituição da Europa, Lisboa, Edições 70.
HALL, Peter A. e David Soskie (2001), Varieties of Capitalism: the Foundations of Comparative Advantage, Oxford University Press, Oxford.
HARRISS, John (2001), Depoliticizing Development. The World Bank and Social Capital, London, Anthem Press.
HARVEY, David (2011), O Enigma do Capital e as Crises do Capitalismo, Lisboa, Bizâncio.
HARVEY, David (2007), Brief History of NeoLiberalism, Oxford, Oxford University Press
KRUGMAN, Paul (2012), Acabem Com Esta Crise, Já!, Lisboa, Editorial Presença.
LOBO, Marina Costa (org.) (2013), Portugal e a Europa: Novas Cidadanias, Lisboa, FFMS.
LOUÇÃ, Francisco et al. (2016), Segurança Social: Defender a Democracia, Lisboa, Bertrand.
MASON, Paul (2016), Pós-Capitalismo: Guia para o nosso futuro, Lisboa, Obejctiva.
MASON, Paul (2010), Meltdown: The End of the Age of Greed, Londres, Verso.
MENDES, Hugo (2008), ?O Caos Normal do Estado Social num Mundo em Globalização?, em Renato Miguel do Carmo, Daniel Melo e Ruy Llera Blanes (coord.), A Globalização do Divã, Edições Tinta-da-China, pp. 147-182.
NISBET, Robert (1966), The Sociological Tradition, London, Heinemann Educational Books.
NOLAN, Brian (2013), ?What use is ?social investment??, Journal of European Social Policy, 23(5), pp. 459-468.
PIKETTY, Thomas (2024). Natureza, Cultura e Desigualdades, Objectiva
PIKETTY, Thomas (2014), O Capital no Século XXI, Lisboa, Temas e Debates.
PINTO, José Madureira (2008), ?Desregulação da economia, menos Estado Social??, em José Madureira Pinto e Virgílio Borges Pereira (orgs.), Desigualdades, Desregulação e Riscos nas Sociedades Contemporâneas, Porto, Afrontamento, pp. 105-135.
PORTES, Alejandro (2000), ?Capital social: origens e aplicações na sociologia contemporânea ?, Sociologia Problemas e Práticas, nº 33, pp. 133-158.
PUTNAM, Robert (2000), Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community, New York, Simon & Schuster.
RAWLS, John (2001 [1971]), Uma Teoria da Justiça, 2ª ed., Lisboa, Editorial Presença.
REDFIELD, Robert (1989 [1960]), The Little Community and Peasant Society and Culture, Chicago, The University Chicago Press.
RODRIGUES, Eduardo Vítor (2010), Escassos Caminhos, Porto, Edições Afrontamento.
RODRIGUES, João (2022), O Neoliberalismo não é um Slogan, Lisboa, Tinta-da-China.
ROTHSTEIN, Bo (2005), Social Traps and the Problem of Trust, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
SCHNEIBERG, Marc and Michael Lounsbury (2008), "Social Movements and Institutional Analysis", em Greenwood, Royston, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahline Roy Suddaby (eds.), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, London, Sage Publications, pp.650-670
SANDEL, Michael J. (2022). A Tirania do Mérito. Editorial presença
SEN, Amartya (2003), Desenvolvimento como Liberdade, Lisboa, Gradiva.
SEN, Amartya (2011), A Ideia de Justiça, Coimbra, Almedina.
SILVA, Filipe Carreira da (2013), O Futuro do Estado Social, Lisboa, FFMS.
SILVA, Filipe Carreira da (2013) (Org.), Os Portugueses e o Estado-Providência, Lisboa, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
SILVA, Pedro Adão e (2002), ?O modelo de Welfare da Europa do Sul: reflexões sobre a utilidade do conceito?, Sociologia Problemas e Práticas, nº 38, pp. 25-59.
SILVA, Pedro Adão e Mariana Trigo Pereira (2015), Cuidar do Futuro: os Mitos do Estado Social Português, Lisboa, Clube do Autor.
STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (2004), Globalização: a Grande Desilusão, Lisboa, Terramar.
STIGLITZ, Joseph E. (2012), The Price of Inequality, W. W. Norton &Company, Nova Iorque.
STREECK, W. (2013), Tempo Comprado: A Crise Adiada do Capitalismo Democrático, Coimbra, Actual.
TOCQUEVILLE, Alexis de (2008 [1835-1840]), Da Democracia na América, col. Antropos, Lisboa, Relógio D?Água
WALLERSTEIN, I., Collins, R., Mann, M, Derluguian, G., Calhoun, C. (2013), Does capitalism Have a Future?, Oxford University Press.
WELLMAN, Barry (1979), ?The comumunity question: the intimate networks of East Yorkers?, American Journal of Sociology, 84 (5), 1201-1231.
WIRTH, Louis (1938), ?Urbanism as a way of life?, The American Journal of Sociology, 44 (1),1-24.
WOLF, Martin (2008), Por que Funciona a Globalização, Lisboa, Dom Quixote.
WOOLCOCK, Michael (2008), ?Civil society and the formation of social capital?, em Manuel Villaverde Cabral (org.), Sucesso e Incesso. Escola, Economia e Sociedade, Lisboa, Fundação Calouste Gulbenkian, pp. 269-297.
Research Methods in Social Sciences
By the end of the CU, each student should have acquired the necessary competencies to:
OA1. Define the stages of a research process in the social sciences, identifying the role of methods and research techniques in the production of scientific knowledge;
OA2. Distinguish between extensive and intensive methodological strategies, demonstrating their characteristics, potentials, and limitations;
OA3. Develop and validate instruments for data collection in the context of extensive research, including defining the sampling process and constructing questionnaires;
OA4. Develop and validate instruments for use in intensive research, including designing interview guides and defining fieldwork;
OA5. Understand the structure of a database, classify variables, and interpret tables and graphs;
OA6. Analyze and interpret qualitative data, using content analysis of interviews and other documents.
CP1 - The Research Process
1.1 Introduction to the Research Process in Social Sciences
1.2 The Stages of the Research Process
1.3 Research Methods and Techniques: Key Notions and Characteristics
CP2 - Extensive Research
2.1 Extensive Research: Main Characteristics
2.2 Planning and Conducting Surveys using Questionnaires
2.3 Key Sampling Techniques
2.4 Types of Questions, Construction, and Validation of Questionnaires
2.5 Online Surveys
CP3 - Intensive Research
3.1 Intensive Research: Main Characteristics
3.2 Types of Interviews and Levels of Directiveness
3.3 Planning and Conducting Interviews
3.4 Developing Interview Guides
CP4 - Analysis and Interpretation of Quantitative and Qualitative Data
4.1 Structure of quantitative databases
4.2 Variables and Types of Variables
4.3 Interpretation of Tables and Graphs and their Suitability to Types of Variables
4.4 Content Analysis of Interviews and Other Documents
Students can choose one of the two assessment methods established for this UC in accordance with the General Regulation on Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (RGACC) of ISCTE: Assessment throughout the semester and Assessment by exam.
Assessment throughout the semester: This assessment method consists of two components: Methodological Applications Pathway (60%) and Group Assignment (40%).
a) Methodological Applications Pathway: This component consists of a sequence of methodological exercises that challenge students to apply the knowledge acquired in each block of programmatic contents of the UC. The exercises are completed individually throughout the semester, either synchronously or asynchronously, allowing for continuous assessment of students and their progress in the field of social research methods. To remain assessed throughout the semester, students may opt to skip the submission of only one of the proposed methodological exercises. The grade obtained in this component accounts for 60% of the final grade for the UC.
b) Group Assignment: This component involves analyzing two empirical studies, one intensive and one extensive, based on the examination of two master’s theses related to the students' areas of interest. Preference should be given to analyzing master’s theses developed within the scientific field of the student's enrolled master's program. The work can be done in groups (two members) or individually. The document must be written according to the structure proposed by the teaching team. To remain assessed throughout the semester, students must achieve a minimum grade of 10 points on the Group Assignment. The grade obtained in this component accounts for 40% of the final grade for the UC.
In addition to the minimum requirements for each component, assessment throughout the semester requires students to attend at least 60% of the classes.
Assessment by exam: This assessment occurs exclusively during the exam period and covers all the material taught in the curricular unit, with both theoretical and theoretical-practical questions. It consists of an individual written exam designed to evaluate both the practical skills for applying social research methods and the theoretical knowledge gained from reading the main bibliography. Students who have chosen this assessment method, as well as those who did not pass the assessment throughout the semester, are eligible for this assessment method.
Albarello, L. et al. (2011). Práticas e métodos de investigação em ciências sociais. Gradiva.
Bardin, L. (2020). Análise de conteúdo (Edição revista e ampliada). Edições 70.
Beaud, S., & Weber, F. (2007). Guia para a pesquisa de campo. Editora Vozes.
Bryman, A. (2022). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Campenhoudt, L. V., Marquet, J., & Quivy, R. (2023). Manual de investigação em ciências sociais (2ª ed. rev.). Gradiva.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Foddy, W. (1996). Como perguntar – Teoria e prática da construção de perguntas para entrevistas e questionários. Celta Editora.
Ghiglione, R., & Matalon, B. (1992). O inquérito – Teoria e prática. Celta Editora.
Maroco, J. (2021). Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics (7ª ed.). ReportNumber.
Becker, H. (1997). Métodos de pesquisa em Ciências Sociais. Hucitec.
Bertaux, D. (2020). As narrativas de vida. Mundos Sociais.
Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1993). Análise de dados em ciências sociais: introdução às técnicas utilizando o SPSS. Celta Editora.
Burgess, R. (2001). A pesquisa de terreno: uma introdução. Celta Editora.
DeCastellarnau, A. (2018). A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1523-1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0533-4
Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (Orgs.). (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Laureano, R., & Botelho, M. C. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics: O meu manual de consulta rápida (3ª ed.). Sílabo.
Moreira, J. M. (2004). Questionários: Teoria e Prática. Almedina.
Oliveira, A. et al. (2021). O questionário online na investigação em educação: reflexões epistemológicas, metodológicas e éticas. Universidade Aberta.
Paugam, S. (Coord.). (2015). A pesquisa sociológica. Editora Vozes.
Silva, A. S., & Pinto, J. M. (2014 [1986]). Metodologia das ciências sociais. Edições Afrontamento.
Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sue, V. e Ritter, L.A. (2012). Conducting Online Surveys (2ª ed.), Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Vicente, P., Reis, E. & Ferrão, F. (2001). Sondagens. A amostragem como factor decisivo de qualidade. Sílabo.
Sociological Theory
(a) Acquisition of basic knowledge about the main currents of sociological theory.
(b) Acquisition of basic knowledge about key issues in sociological theory.
(c) Development of skills for use of key sociological concepts and analytical statements.
01 Introduction: controversies and domains in sociological theory
I History of sociological theory
02 Classical sociological theory
03 Modern sociological theory
04 Contemporary sociological theory
II Domains of sociological theory
05 Interaction as exchange
06 Symbolic interaction
07 Stratification
08 Institutions
09 Groups and networks
10 Organisations
One individual paper, with a maximum of 20,000 characters including spaces, on a subject that each student choose from a fixed list. Deadline: December 29, 2023.
Pires, Rui Pena (2007), ?Árvores conceptuais: uma reconstrução multidimensional dos conceitos de ação e de estrutura?, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 53, pp. 11-50.
Scott, John (2011), Conceptualising the Social World: Principles of Sociological Analysis, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1994, 1999), Sociologia: Conceitos e Aplicações, São Paulo, Makron Books.
* Bibliografia de trabalho / referências das aulas
Baert, Patrick, e Filipe Carreira da Silva (2014), Teoria Social Contemporânea, Lisboa, Mundos Sociais:
cap. 3, ?O enigma da vida quotidiana: o interacionismo simbólico, a abordagem dramatúrgica e a etnometodologia?, pp. 81-112.
Fulcher, James, e John Scott (2011), Sociology, 4.ª ed., Oxford, Oxford University Press: cap. 2, ?Theories and theorizing?, pp. 20-68.
Pires, Rui Pena (2014), ?Modelo teórico de análise sociológica?, Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, 74, pp. 31-50.
Ritzer, George, e Jeffrey Stepnisky (2018), Sociological Theory, 10.ª ed., Nova Iorque, McGraw-Hill:
[complementar] cap. 6, ?A historical sketch of sociological theory: The later years?, pp. 261-311;
cap. 13, ?Micro-macro and agency-structure integration?, pp. 592-647.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1991), The Structure of Sociological Theory, 5.ª ed., Belmont (Cal.), Wadsworth: cap. 1, ?Sociological theory: diversity and disagreement?, pp. 1-30.
Turner, Jonathan H. (1994, 1999), Sociologia: Conceitos e Aplicações, São Paulo, Makron Books:
cap. 1, ?A natureza e as origens da sociologia?, pp. 1-16;
cap. 2, ?Propostas teóricas e metodológicas na sociologia?, pp. 17-32;
cap. 7, ?Grupos e organizações?, pp. 93-110;
cap. 8, ?Desigualdades: classe, etnia e género?, pp. 111-134;
cap. 9, ?Instituições?, pp. 137-166.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2010), Theoretical Principles of Sociology, vol. 1, Macrodynamics,
Nova Iorque, Springer:
[complementar] cap 4, ?The dynamics of institutional domains?, pp. 105-151.
[complementar] cap 5, ?The dynamics of stratification systems?, pp. 153-214.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2012), Theoretical Principles of Sociology, vol. 3, Mesodynamics,
Nova Iorque, Springer:
[complementar] cap. 5, ?The dynamics of groups?, pp. 171-212;
[complementar] cap. 6, ?The dynamics of organizations?, pp. 213-301.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2013), Theoretical Sociology: 1830 to Present, Londres, Sage:
[complementar] cap. 15, ?Exchange theorizing?, pp. 520-573.
Turner, Jonathan H. (2014), Theoretical Sociology: A Concise Introduction to Twelve Sociological Theories, Londres, Sage:
cap 5, ?Exchange theorizing?, pp. 73-95;
[complementar] cap. 6, ?Symbolic interactionist theorizing?, pp. 96-116;
[complementar] cap. 7, ?Dramaturgical theorizing?, pp. 117-135.
Research Methods in Social Sciences
By the end of the CU, each student should have acquired the necessary competencies to:
OA1. Define the stages of a research process in the social sciences, identifying the role of methods and research techniques in the production of scientific knowledge;
OA2. Distinguish between extensive and intensive methodological strategies, demonstrating their characteristics, potentials, and limitations;
OA3. Develop and validate instruments for data collection in the context of extensive research, including defining the sampling process and constructing questionnaires;
OA4. Develop and validate instruments for use in intensive research, including designing interview guides and defining fieldwork;
OA5. Understand the structure of a database, classify variables, and interpret tables and graphs;
OA6. Analyze and interpret qualitative data, using content analysis of interviews and other documents.
CP1 - The Research Process
1.1 Introduction to the Research Process in Social Sciences
1.2 The Stages of the Research Process
1.3 Research Methods and Techniques: Key Notions and Characteristics
CP2 - Extensive Research
2.1 Extensive Research: Main Characteristics
2.2 Planning and Conducting Surveys using Questionnaires
2.3 Key Sampling Techniques
2.4 Types of Questions, Construction, and Validation of Questionnaires
2.5 Online Surveys
CP3 - Intensive Research
3.1 Intensive Research: Main Characteristics
3.2 Types of Interviews and Levels of Directiveness
3.3 Planning and Conducting Interviews
3.4 Developing Interview Guides
CP4 - Analysis and Interpretation of Quantitative and Qualitative Data
4.1 Structure of quantitative databases
4.2 Variables and Types of Variables
4.3 Interpretation of Tables and Graphs and their Suitability to Types of Variables
4.4 Content Analysis of Interviews and Other Documents
Students can choose one of the two assessment methods established for this UC in accordance with the General Regulation on Assessment of Knowledge and Skills (RGACC) of ISCTE: Assessment throughout the semester and Assessment by exam.
Assessment throughout the semester: This assessment method consists of two components: Methodological Applications Pathway (60%) and Group Assignment (40%).
a) Methodological Applications Pathway: This component consists of a sequence of methodological exercises that challenge students to apply the knowledge acquired in each block of programmatic contents of the UC. The exercises are completed individually throughout the semester, either synchronously or asynchronously, allowing for continuous assessment of students and their progress in the field of social research methods. To remain assessed throughout the semester, students may opt to skip the submission of only one of the proposed methodological exercises. The grade obtained in this component accounts for 60% of the final grade for the UC.
b) Group Assignment: This component involves analyzing two empirical studies, one intensive and one extensive, based on the examination of two master’s theses related to the students' areas of interest. Preference should be given to analyzing master’s theses developed within the scientific field of the student's enrolled master's program. The work can be done in groups (two members) or individually. The document must be written according to the structure proposed by the teaching team. To remain assessed throughout the semester, students must achieve a minimum grade of 10 points on the Group Assignment. The grade obtained in this component accounts for 40% of the final grade for the UC.
In addition to the minimum requirements for each component, assessment throughout the semester requires students to attend at least 60% of the classes.
Assessment by exam: This assessment occurs exclusively during the exam period and covers all the material taught in the curricular unit, with both theoretical and theoretical-practical questions. It consists of an individual written exam designed to evaluate both the practical skills for applying social research methods and the theoretical knowledge gained from reading the main bibliography. Students who have chosen this assessment method, as well as those who did not pass the assessment throughout the semester, are eligible for this assessment method.
Albarello, L. et al. (2011). Práticas e métodos de investigação em ciências sociais. Gradiva.
Bardin, L. (2020). Análise de conteúdo (Edição revista e ampliada). Edições 70.
Beaud, S., & Weber, F. (2007). Guia para a pesquisa de campo. Editora Vozes.
Bryman, A. (2022). Social research methods (6th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Campenhoudt, L. V., Marquet, J., & Quivy, R. (2023). Manual de investigação em ciências sociais (2ª ed. rev.). Gradiva.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Flick, U. (2018). An introduction to qualitative research (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Foddy, W. (1996). Como perguntar – Teoria e prática da construção de perguntas para entrevistas e questionários. Celta Editora.
Ghiglione, R., & Matalon, B. (1992). O inquérito – Teoria e prática. Celta Editora.
Maroco, J. (2021). Análise estatística com o SPSS Statistics (7ª ed.). ReportNumber.
Becker, H. (1997). Métodos de pesquisa em Ciências Sociais. Hucitec.
Bertaux, D. (2020). As narrativas de vida. Mundos Sociais.
Bryman, A. & Cramer, D. (1993). Análise de dados em ciências sociais: introdução às técnicas utilizando o SPSS. Celta Editora.
Burgess, R. (2001). A pesquisa de terreno: uma introdução. Celta Editora.
DeCastellarnau, A. (2018). A classification of response scale characteristics that affect data quality: A literature review. Quality & Quantity, 52(4), 1523-1559. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-017-0533-4
Della Porta, D., & Keating, M. (Orgs.). (2008). Approaches and methodologies in the social sciences: A pluralist perspective. Cambridge University Press.
Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (Eds.). (2018). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research (5th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Laureano, R., & Botelho, M. C. (2017). IBM SPSS Statistics: O meu manual de consulta rápida (3ª ed.). Sílabo.
Moreira, J. M. (2004). Questionários: Teoria e Prática. Almedina.
Oliveira, A. et al. (2021). O questionário online na investigação em educação: reflexões epistemológicas, metodológicas e éticas. Universidade Aberta.
Paugam, S. (Coord.). (2015). A pesquisa sociológica. Editora Vozes.
Silva, A. S., & Pinto, J. M. (2014 [1986]). Metodologia das ciências sociais. Edições Afrontamento.
Silverman, D. (2011). Interpreting qualitative data (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Sue, V. e Ritter, L.A. (2012). Conducting Online Surveys (2ª ed.), Thousand Oaks, Sage.
Vicente, P., Reis, E. & Ferrão, F. (2001). Sondagens. A amostragem como factor decisivo de qualidade. Sílabo.
Master Project in Sociology
The students who complete this course must be able to:
a)Elaborate a pertinent problem for an applied project
b)Develop the respective literature review
c)Use theories, concepts and research data to structure a theoretical framework of the problem to be studied
d)Select methods and techniques adjusted to the problem and to the theoretical framework
e)Analyse results of his own study and discuss it critically
f)Communicate orally and write a report on his own master project.
1. Introduction to the seminar. Norms for the master project.
2. First ideas for the master project. Consultation of project models.
3. Orientation and support for the master project. Ideas for the elaboration of the project.
4. Elaboration of a project (objectives, theory, methodology, empirical support, bibliography).
5. Production of the theoretical framework and definition of methods and techniques.
6. Development of the analytical model and operationalization of concepts.
7. Sources for secondary data.
8. Production of original information. Instruments for primary information collection.
9. Analysis planning and its elaboration.
10. Data elaboration and analysis. Orientation on data analysis.
The master project on Sociology is presented and supported in public and it will ve evaluated by a juri. The evaluation is based on the scientific merit of the master project in its theoretical, methodological and empirical components, and on the quality of its oral presentation, according to the norms by ISCTE-IUL.
Valdavida, Magdalena Cordero (1998), Bancos de Datos, Madrid, CIS.
Scott, John (1990), A Matter of Record. Documentary Sources in Social Research, Cambridge, Polity Press.
O'Dochartaigh, Nial (2002), The Internet Research Handbook: a Pratical Guide for Students and Researchers in the Social Sciences, Londres, Sage Publications.
Kielcolt, K. Jill, e Laura E. Nathan (1985), Secondary Analysis of Survey Data, London, Sage.
ISCTE (2008), Normas Orientadoras para a Dissertação ou Trabalho de Projecto de Mestrado.
Hantrais, Linda, e Steen Mangen (eds.) (1996), Cross-National Research Methods in the Social Sciences, London, Pinter.
Foddy, William (1996), Como Perguntar. Teoria e Prática da Construção de Perguntas para Entrevistas e Questionários, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Bryman, Alan (1989), Research Methods and Organization Studies, London, Routledge.
Bell, Judith (1997), Como Realizar um Projecto de Investigação, Lisboa, Gradiva.
http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/
World Values Survey
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/
ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Sciences):
Outros sites:
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm
European Commission ? Public Opinion (Eurobarometer):
http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/
European Values Survey:
http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/
European Social Survey:
Sites europeus:
http://www.apis.ics.ul.pt/
Arquivo de informação social do Instituto de Ciências Sociais:
http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_main
INE Portugal:
Sites nacionais:
Torres, Anália Cardoso (1996), Divórcio em Portugal. Ditos e Interditos, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Pais, José Machado (2002), Sociologia da Vida Quotidiana, Lisboa, ICS.
Lahire, Bernard (2002), Portraits Sociologiques - Dispositions et Variations Individuelles, Paris, Nathan.
Freire, André (2006), Esquerda e Direita na Política Europeia. Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspectiva Comparada, Lisboa, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
Conde, Idalina (1991), "Alvarez: ambiguidades na biografia de um pintor", Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, nº 9.
Casanova, José Luís (2004), Naturezas Sociais. Diversidade e Orientações Sociais na Sociedade Portuguesa, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Carreiras, Helena (2004), Gender and the Military: a Comparative Study of the Participation of Women in the Armed Forces of Western Democracies, Tese de Doutoramento, Lisboa, ISCTE.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993), La Misère du Monde, Paris, Éditions du Seuil.
Master Dissertation in Sociology
The students who complete this course must be able to:
a)Elaborate a pertinent research problem
b)Develop the respective literature review
c)Use theories, concepts and investigation data to structure a theoretical framework of the research problem
d)Select methods and techniques adjusted to the research problem and to the theoretical framework
e)Analyse results of his own research and discuss it critically
f)Communicate orally and write a report on his own research
1. Introduction to the seminar. Norms for the master dissertation.
2. First ideas for the research project. Consultation of research models.
3. Orientation and support for the dissertation. Ideas for the elaboration of the project.
4. Elaboration of a research project (objectives, theory, methodology, empirical support, bibliography).
5. Production of the theoretical framework and definition of methods and techniques.
6. Development of the analytical model and operationalization of concepts.
7. Sources for secondary data.
8. Production of original information. Instruments for primary information collection.
9. Analysis planning and its elaboration.
10. Data elaboration and analysis. Orientation on data analysis.
The master dissertation on Sociology is presented and supported in public and it will ve evaluated by a juri. The evaluation is based on the scientific merit of the dissertation in its theoretical, methodological ad empirical components, and on the quality of its oral presentation, according to the norms by ISCTE-IUL.
Valdavida, Magdalena Cordero (1998), Bancos de Datos, Madrid, CIS.
Scott, John (1990), A Matter of Record. Documentary Sources in Social Research, Cambridge, Polity Press.
O'Dochartaigh, Nial (2002), The Internet Research Handbook: a Pratical Guide for Students and Researchers in the Social Sciences, Londres, Sage Publications.
Kielcolt, K. Jill, e Laura E. Nathan (1985), Secondary Analysis of Survey Data, London, Sage.
ISCTE (2008), Normas Orientadoras para a Dissertação ou Trabalho de Projecto de Mestrado.
Hantrais, Linda, e Steen Mangen (eds.) (1996), Cross-National Research Methods in the Social Sciences, London, Pinter.
Foddy, William (1996), Como Perguntar. Teoria e Prática da Construção de Perguntas para Entrevistas e Questionários, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Bell, Judith (1997), Como Realizar um Projecto de Investigação, Lisboa, Gradiva.
Almeida, João Ferreira de, e José Madureira Pinto (1982), A Investigação nas Ciências Sociais, Lisboa, Editorial Presença.
http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/
World Values Survey
http://www.icpsr.umich.edu/icpsrweb/ICPSR/
ICPSR (Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Sciences):
Outros sites:
http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/index_en.htm
European Commission ? Public Opinion (Eurobarometer):
http://www.europeanvaluesstudy.eu/
European Values Survey:
http://www.europeansocialsurvey.org/
European Social Survey:
Sites europeus:
http://www.apis.ics.ul.pt/
Arquivo de informação social do Instituto de Ciências Sociais:
http://www.ine.pt/xportal/xmain?xpid=INE&xpgid=ine_main
INE Portugal:
Sites nacionais:
Torres, Anália Cardoso (1996), Divórcio em Portugal. Ditos e Interditos, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Pais, José Machado (2002), Sociologia da Vida Quotidiana, Lisboa, ICS.
Lahire, Bernard (2002), Portraits Sociologiques - Dispositions et Variations Individuelles, Paris, Nathan.
Freire, André (2006), Esquerda e Direita na Política Europeia. Portugal, Espanha e Grécia em Perspectiva Comparada, Lisboa, Imprensa de Ciências Sociais.
Conde, Idalina (1991), "Alvarez: ambiguidades na biografia de um pintor", Sociologia, Problemas e Práticas, nº 9.
Casanova, José Luís (2004), Naturezas Sociais. Diversidade e Orientações Sociais na Sociedade Portuguesa, Oeiras, Celta Editora.
Carreiras, Helena (2004), Gender and the Military: a Comparative Study of the Participation of Women in the Armed Forces of Western Democracies, Tese de Doutoramento, Lisboa, ISCTE.
Bourdieu, Pierre (1993), La Misère du Monde, Paris, Éditions du Seuil.
2nd Cycle Internship
The learning outcomes of the Internship are adapted to each internship and the institution where it is developed. These are:
LO1. To acquire technical skills linked to methods and techniques for action within different kinds of institutions related to the general objectives and learning outcomes of the master's degree;
LO2. To develop research and action-research skills within organizations related to the master's degree;
LO3. To prepare an internship report that reveals analytical reflection of the professional or academic context;
LO4. Develop indicators for recording and evaluating professional practice.
1. Topic and problem of the internship
2. Internship plan
3. Theoretical and methodological framework
4. Methodology of collaborative action research
5. Evaluation
6. Report
Individual report, which contains the following elements:
a) Characterization of the institutional context (history, organization, policies and services, activities, organizational structure and functioning);
b) Framing the internship institution;
c) Description of the activities developed (roles, responsibilities, agents, work processes, methodologies used)
d) Critical and theoretically based conclusions
e) References
The UC does not contemplate the modality of evaluation by Exam.
- Sweitzer, H. Frederick e King, Mary A. (2014), The Successful Internship: Personal, Professional, and Civic Development in Experiential Learning, Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole, Cengage Learning.
- Reeher, Gant e Mariani, Mack (2002), The Insider's Guide To Political Internships: What To Do Once You're In The Door, Nova Iorque: Basic Books
- Neves, José, Garrido, Margarida, Simões Eduardo (2008), Manual de Competências Pessoais, Interpessoais e Instrumentais. Teoria e Prática, Lisboa: Editora SÍLABO
- Della Porta, Donatella e Keating Michael (eds.) (2008) Approaches and Methodologies in the Social Sciences. A Pluralist Perspective, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Courtney, Roger (2013), Strategic Management in the Third Sector, Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan
- Capucha, Luís (2008), Planeamento e Avaliação de Projetos. Guião Prático, Lisboa: ME/DGIDC
Recommended optative
Optional courses will only be held if they achieve a minimum number of enrollments.
For the class in english language:
1st semester
Contemporary Debates in Sociological Theory
Linguistic Diversity in Contemporary Societies
2nd semester
Sociology and Epistemology
Accreditations
